
Recently, some students did a project in which they interviewed some individuals in the public about history, metanarratives, biblical world views, etc. (Clips to be posted soon!) One of the most interesting responses the students received for whether history could be trusted or not was "no, because, look at the Bible." Implication: History can't be trusted and the Bible is a good example of that. I am surprised at how many Christians sacrifice the historicity of the Scriptures as well. Making the Bible a collection of Myths, allegories and fables flies into many of its own claims (2 Peter 1:16) thereby condemning all of it if it is false. Nevertheless, it is done from Evolution to Archaeology as if waiting for its confirmation is a matter of popularity. It seems to be popular with at least one person: Christ--making him a liar too, if he is wrong. (Matthew 5:18, Luke 16:17) A while ago I ran into the following video segment that does a good job demonstrating just how trustworthy Scripture is compared to other "historical" records, I wonder what scientific method could be employed to find a source of greater dependability?


Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


0 Response to "The Bible as History"